Saturday, 14 October 2017

Comparison of Aristophanes, Plautus and Shakespeare. (Year 13/NCEA Level 3)

Aristophanes wrote and produced comedies in Greece from 423 BC to 405 BC. These plays and his techniques have had a lasting effect on the future of comedy and its place in human life. This can be shown through comparisons to other legendary comedy playwrights, Plautus and Shakespeare, with a time period spanning more than 2000 years.
Theatre

Aristophanes

Aristophanes’s plays were shown during the festivals The Great Dionysia and Lenaea in an open air theatre called The Theatre of Dionysus, a large circular structure with the ability to accommodate approximately 17,000 people, built into the side of the Acropolis in Athens.  The original structure dates to the 6th Century BC and though it was later updated to stone, in Aristophanes time (5th Century BC) it would have been built using wood and earth. The seats radiate away from the centre of the theatre, the Orchestra. (A) The Orchestra was a circle of hard packed earth encircled in stone, approximately 18m in diameter. It was dug out of the hillside and flattened, allowing the seats to tier back from this. The Orchestra would provide place for the chorus to sing, dance, recite poetry and perform the Parabasis- arguably the most important part of the play where the chorus step out of their roles and address the audience directly. It contributed to the openness of the theatre and connected Aristophanes’s plays to fertility festivals and dances worshipping the gods, from which theatre was derived. The Paradoi (E) were the wide entrance ways, used sometimes by main actors but mostly by the chorus, during their grand first procession of singing, dancing and marching. This procession was a very exciting and engaging part of the play for viewers and the Paradoi attributed to the greatness. The Theatron (B) was the name given to the tiers of seats looking down over the orchestra and the skene. Seats were in concentric arcs, built into a hollowed hillside, radiating away from the centre. The shape of the seats gave excellent acoustics, aiding the actors in speaking and making it possible for all audience members to hear what was being said. An audience member in the back row was 90m from the stage house and a 2m actor would only appear 1.8cm tall. This explains the need for large masks and phalli- so that everybody could see the play. In Aristophanes time, the seats were wooden and could be removed after the festivities. Dividing the arcs into bands were wide passages (called Diaxomata) and these bands were further divided by wide staircases. This helped with ease of access for the audience. The Skene (C) was the stage house, a small wooden hut with stone foundations. It was small and out of proportion for the theatre and this was possibly due to a lack of wood in wartime. It would have been built strongly to withstand kicking and action on the roof, such as in Aristophanes Wasps when Philocleon escapes to and then lowers himself from a tiled roof. The Skene was possibly two storied as in Aristophanes Frogs, Pluto is apparently speaking from higher window.      
Plautus 
Plautus’s plays were performed during religious worship festivals as part of the celebrations called Ludi (meaning festival games). Theatre was not a priority in these times (c. 205BC-184BC), a permanent theatre would be expensive and a moratorium on building permanent theatres was in place till 55BC, so a temporary wooden theatre would be erected for the days of the festival in a public place and then dismantled quickly after. This put some restrictions on the size of the theatre, making it considerably smaller than the Theatre of Dionysus. This placed limits on both seating and action on stage and changed the interaction with the audience.  The set out of the theatre was very similar to that of early Greek theatre. There was a long and narrow stage house at the front and centre of the theatre. It was a lot smaller than Greek theatres again because of the temporary nature of the performances. The stage house had 3 openings/doors, often a brothel, temple and hero’s house.  The set was designed to imitate local settings so that the audience could recognise allusions and easily identify the characters and plot. For instance, in the play Amphitryon, there would have been a god’s house for Jupiter, a normal house front for Alcmena and Amphitryon and a ship/pier setting for the plot line. They would have been made in a style which showed the audience the setting in ancient Thebes. The wooden stage in front of the stage house (Pulpitium) was also a lot smaller than the Proskenian of Greek times. As copied from the Greek theatre, there was a flat Orchestra, except it was altered to be a semi-circle. There was no chorus in Greek theatre so this area was used as overflow for seating. Those who were lower social class would stand in the orchestra, jammed up against the Pulpitium, influencing the nature of the play. As the audience were a lot closer, (those sitting as well those standing) there was no need for the dramatic action and over the top gestures of Aristophanes’s plays. The actors could utilize their voices as the storytellers and the audience felt more involved and a part of the play. For instance, in Amphitryon during Alcmena and Amphitryon’s fight, instead of using large gestures and body language, words and tone would have been used to show each of the character’s anguish.  Plautine theatres also had concentric tiers of bench-like seating, (called Cavea) as well as wings curving around the back of the stage house. This helped carry and amplify the sound so that everyone could hear the actors and prologue.

Shakespeare
Shakespeare’s plays were shown in The Globe Theatre in London, which was built in 1599. It was an open air three story theatre with 8 sides and a partial roof.  Data suggests it was 30m in diameter and could hold 3000 audience members. The orchestra equivalent in The Globe was called The Pit (2) where people could pay a penny to stand on the earth floor to watch the play. Behind this, rising in 3 levels were box like Galleries (3) with stadium style seats which were considerably more expensive than then standing. The lower seats were tiered seating and there is evidence to suggest that the upper stories were presidential suites with space for a couple of very rich/important people. This created a division in social status, much like in Plautus’s time.  The organisation of the seating created good visibility and sound travel. A rectangular Main Stage (1) also called Apron Stage (1) thrust from the back of the theatre into the centre of the Pit (2). It was 13m wide, 8m deep and had a height of 1.5m. There were 3 doors to the stage, with centre being a window to an inner stage. There was also a balcony over the stage used most famously in Romeo and Juliet but also by Beatrice in the comedy Much Ado about Nothing. This is where musicians played from. The doors led to the Tiring House which is where actors got dressed and entered/exited the stage. The floors above this were used as storage for props and costumes and possibly offices. The thatched roof wrapped around the structure and covered those in stadium seating, but those in the Pit (2) were uncovered.

Summary
We can see that Aristophanes’s theatres layouts had lasting impact on the design and use of theatres through following years. This would partly be because of the success of this set up and how effective the design was at carrying sound and accommodating large audiences. In modern theatre and stages we can see large similarities as well, especially with sloping seating and backstage areas.
The images and details of the theatre remains almost constant throughout the playwrights. All of them have a stage, a stage house and an orchestra. Aristophanes and Plautus both use concentric tiered seating and Shakespeare uses this but adds vertical privileged seating also. This is because the tiered seating was very effective at holding many people who all have a view of the stage, as well amplifying the word, song and music from the stage. The Globe added the vertical seating because of the strict social status divisions. This can be seen in the fact that people who stood on the ground were called groundlings and also ‘stinkards.’ Apparently they were sweaty and dirty and smelt awful. They often started fights and occasionally threw things at the actors. The rich and high status people would have wanted to be separated from this, and in order to make everyone happy, the vertical seating was added.
Aristophanes’s theatre could hold a lot more people because his plays were shown once during festivals and the play would help the population make important political decisions. Therefore, as many people as possible had to attend.  Plautus’s theatre could seat less but his plays were more for entertainment and weren’t a popular form of entertainment in his era. This is because the Romans preferred things such as ritual fights in the infamous Colosseum. It was a society where violence was valued over humorous plays. Shakespeare’s theatre could seat even fewer people, but he put on plays every day and as many as 3000 people attended each day. This means that a smaller theatre was sufficient.  
Aristophanes’s theatre was constructed from a hollowed hillside and utilizes the gradient of the slope, whereas Plautus and Shakespeare showed their plays in built wooden structures. This was because of the advances in technology over time and the unavailability of the perfect hillside. For instance, to cater for the large city population, Shakespeare’s theatre was built in London which is very flat.
The Stage House underwent some minor changes over time also. In Plautus’s era it became smaller, because of the temporary nature of the theatre. Roman society and culture did not value the theatre and so performance venues had to be cheap and temporary constructions. In The Globe, it became larger because of the availability of materials and the 3 story construction. This is because the theatre had become a staple of entertainment in this culture. There is evidence to suggest that in Aristophanes’s time, there was an opening in the skene that looked into a scene or new setting called an Ekkyklema. This was not a feature of Plautus’s theatre as the temporary theatre and stage house was only small and did have the three sets (doors) opening onto the main stage. However, this is a feature of the permanent structure The Globe. There was space and resources to build this, and it allowed Shakespeare to provide more interesting and multi-faceted plays.
The Orchestra also changed a little over time. The Orchestra in the Greek theatre was a large circle, an adaption of the dancing circle from Greek fertility festivals. There wasn’t a chorus in Roman plays and the idea to make it a place for people to stand meant there was more room for audience members. This continued in Shakespeare’s Globe where people stood in The Pit which remained a semi-circle except the stage cut halfway into it. In both Aristophanes’s and Plautus’s theatre, the stage was flush with the orchestra. I expect the change in The Globe is because it meant the audience were more wrapped around the stage, giving them a sense of involvement, as well as supplying a good view to those in the second and third story.
In the Theatre of Dionysus there was a crane, called a mechane which was used to lift gods onto the stage house roof in some plays. This was not a feature in Plautus’s theatre because the theatre was temporary and therefore simpler and cheaper in design.  Also Plautus’s plays reflected real life, so there was need for someone to be flying into a scene. However, there was a crane-like structure in the Globe, where characters flew up and down through a trap door from ‘heaven’ (the partial roof).  
The social and wealth divisions seems to have carried through the centuries. In Aristophanes’s theatre, those who were important figures in the community such as priests and politicians sat in the first rows, meaning they were closer to the action. Those less important sat further away, where it was harder to hear and see the actors. There is little evidence that women attended Aristophanes’s theatre, as men were of much higher status and had political power, whereas women were restricted to home and domestic life. In Plautus’s theatre those who were more valued in society were able to sit, whereas people with lower social status stood. There are conflicting views over whether women were allowed to watch Roman theatre, but if they were, they would have a separated seating section. This was further perpetuated in Shakespeare’s theatre where there were three different social and economic groupings. This is because of changing view of class and women as time progressed. 
Costume

Aristophanes

The three main characters, if playing men (there were only ever 3) wore skin suits with a ‘grotesquely’ padded stomach. They also wore a large leather phallus 45 cm in length, so it was very visible from the back of the theatre. The costume was appropriate to the character and time period so a traditional costume would be a ‘chiton,’ a sleeveless flowing garment. They also might wear a ‘himation,’ a cloak over this. In The Frogs the actor playing Dionysus would have been wearing his lion skin so that the audience could easily identify him. In the scenes after the Parabasis actors switched roles by swapping “the club and the lion skin” and the luggage between Dionysus and Xanthias (slave) to aid the plot and comically show Dionysus’s scared nature. Actors playing females (only men were actors) wore a floor length chiton often yellow in colour. The chorus wore colourful outfits, befitting of whether they were a wasp, a bird or a frog. In The Wasps “they’ve got stings in their butts- and they know how to use them!” This would have had comedic value but also attributed to the meaning behind the jurymen being similar to wasps. The chorus members probably all wore identical outfits. The outfits helped to put the actor or chorus member into character and helped the audience understand the character’s position in the play. A large part of the costuming was the use of masks. The masks were made from linen soaked in plaster and were large and exaggerated with oversized mouths and large eyes, as we can see in the picture on the right. They have to be very large and exaggerated because of the big audience- the people at the back had to be able to recognise who the character was. They could be made in a general ‘stock’ characters type such as soldier, middle aged man and slave, or could be made trying to emulate the face of a living or historical individual. This means that Aristophanes could have recognisable characters even if they themselves were not acting in the play. A stock character’s mask would have different components, for instance white skin showed us that it was a female and red indicated a male. Yellow skin show us that his job was a philosopher whereas an added beard emphasized the character’s masculinity. The masks were a way of completely transforming an actor into a character and meant that the audience knew what Aristophanes was trying to say. They also served as amplifying devices, with the wide gaping mouths projecting the actor’s voice upwards and out into the theatre. They helped the 17,000 viewers hear Aristophanes’s play and therefore his message.

Plautus’s costumes, much like his content, were copied and adapted from those of Aristophanes. Actors wore traditional outfits of the time, depending on their role. The stock standard outfit was a pallium, a piece of cloth draped over and around an actor, similar to a toga with a tunic, a cloak like piece over top.  In Roman theatre, different colours represented different characters. An old man’s was white and a slave’s, woman’s and youth’s were brightly coloured.  Old men also had a cane to show their agedness. Men playing women wore the pallium equivalent, the palla, which was longer, often fringed, thinner and decorated to show that the character was a woman. Women characters also wore jewellery and the more jewellery she was wearing, the richer and higher status the character was. Plautus also used masks, either a full face mask like the Greeks, or a half mask which left the actor’s lips and chin uncovered. (This was more comfortable for the jaw) By the features of the mask, the audience could determine the type of character and in some cases, the temperament of the character. Most were pale, with the more pale representing youth or a young man. Slave’s masks were more ruddy, indicating their working status. This can be seen in the mask on the right, which is what Sosia in Amphitryon would have worn. A youthful man often had black or brown hair, while a kind old man had white hair and a mean old man red hair. Women’s masks were often made to be a bit more yellow, especially when creating an old women. The mouths of the masks were wide to help to project their voices, identically to the Greek Masks. Plautus utilizes the mask in plays such as Amphitryon when Jupiter transforms to be identical to Sosia to trick him. Also in Menaechmi he would have used identical costumes and masks to portray twins which would give a visual reality to the mistaken identity storyline.

Shakespeare                                                                       
Characters in Shakespeare’s plays wore clothes of the time of the play that they were performing. For plays based in the 1500’s (then present day) actors wore colourful dresses and tunics, padded in a way that created a twisted version of the reality of a human body. The padding on shoulders and hips as well as large ruffs around the neck were a trend in the 1500’s and these costumes grew larger over this century. The aim was to wear as many fabrics and colours as possible simultaneously as this showed status, so making the outside of the costume larger meant that more could be fitted in and worn together. In these days there were strict laws about clothes as they were a sign of rank, and people caught dressing above their own rank could be put in the stocks. Actors however, were the only ones allowed to dress out of their rank, which let them play noblemen and women on the stage. Men wore a shirt called a doublet and often had a padded belly underneath and puffy trunk hose covering their pelvis. They wore ¾ tight pants and tights underneath this. You tell the rank of the men apart because a gallant man always had a sword, and a lower ranked man wore cheaper fabrics and did not have tights underneath their outfit. Men acting as women wore wide dresses with huge padded sleeves and hips. The more impractical the dress was, the higher rank the character was. Woman characters covered themselves in jewels with necklaces, rings and earrings. Very high ranked characters had diamonds and pearls sewn into their dresses. However, the costume would have had cut glass rather than diamond, as no one would lend their expensive jewellery. Women characters also wore perfumed gloves. In Much Ado about Nothing, Hero says “these gloves the Count sent me, they are an excellent perfume.” Gloves indicated femininity and that the woman was very fashionable. Shakespeare occasionally spoke of costume in his pays and used it as a comedic device such as in Twelfth Night, when a joker pretending to be Olivia demands that Malvolio wear yellow stockings with cross garters. Stage make up also gave the audience an idea about who the character was. Different colours could be used to emulate dark skin or very pale characters. It was a vital part of transforming a boy into a young woman. The boy would have a white face, red cheeks and a blond wig. Crushed pearls were sometimes added to create a shining affect for actors playing fairies, such as in Midsummers Night Dream.

Summary
Masks were used in Aristophanes and Plautus. Mostly, this is due to their success at total and fast transformation from an actor to any character. This device also meant that one actor could play many different actors in one play, saving money and also ensured that the rules of how many actors could be on the stage could be enforced, without sacrificing how many characters the play had. The Greek and Roman theatres were huge and so the masks were used to project the voice so that all audience members could hear the play and therefore the playwright’s message. However, the Globe theatre was a lot smaller in comparison and the projection wasn’t needed. The disadvantage of masks were that they meant that the actor could show no facial emotion. Shakespeare needed the characters to show many different emotions to make the plays more relatable, so the use of masks was abandoned.
All playwrights used costumes of the time in which the play was set. To the audience this would have made the play more lifelike and therefore more interesting. The costumes were a big part of how visually convincing the play was, so that the messages also became real and of importance.
All playwrights also used costume as a way to show what class or what type of person the character was. In all of the societies we are talking about, the class of a person was an important part of who they were. Therefore it was important that this was reflected in their costume. The audience had more understanding of how they should feel about them.

Humour and Content

Aristophanes
Aristophanes used many different comedic devices to connect with his audience, including bawdiness, parody, visual, scatology, satire, surrealism, slapstick, puns, ridicule and verbal wit. Humour was a very important part of Greek theatre as it captured the attention of the audience. This meant that Aristophanes could draw the audience in and then tell them important messages about political decisions and Athenian society. The humour would help the audience listen to his messages about the Peloponnesian War, Cleon and the aftermath of Arginusae. However, the sole purpose of the plays was not only to speak Aristophanes’s thoughts, but to celebrate creativity and theatre. He used bawdy humour often.  Bawdy humour reminds us of the fertility festival origins of Greek theatre and shows the audience what joy and pleasure they have lost by going to war and leaving the old Athenian ideas. He uses both verbal and physical bawdiness. For example in The Wasps, when Philocleon exclaims “This is dreadful: what’s happening to me? I’m softening.” And the scene with the slave girl when Philocleon says “Hold onto this rope. Be careful, it’s a bit old and worn; but you’d be surprised what it’ll stand up to!” In The Frogs, when the two poets are arguing, Aeschylus comments that “No one can say that I have ever put an erotic female into any play of mine.” And Euripides interjects with “How could you? You’ve never even met one!” Visual humour was very strong in his plays. This comes from the animal costumes of the fertility phallic processions that theatre originated from. One example of this is the large ‘stings’ which the jurymen wore in The Wasps. The naked flute girl in the same play would have been funny because everybody would have known the actor was male. The sight of Dionysos in The Frogs would have been funny because he was trying to disguise himself as hero Heracles, but visible is his long feminine nightshirt. The Wasps is also rich in satire in the Trial of the Dog, which helps Aristophanes criticise the jury system, the jurymen and Cleon. The entire trial of the dog stealing cheese scene is a satire of a current Athenian situation, where “the Dog of Cydathenaeum” is Cleon and the dog is Labes. The guilty/ not guilty decision is decided before the entire trial when Philocleon comments “Ha, wait till he hears his sentence!” also, the jury infers guilt from the dog’s look, Philocleon commenting “The filthy scum, look at his furtive look!” Also, in Cleon’s opinion the greater crime is not sharing the stolen cheese. All of this satire of the real jury system in Greece shows the audience how unjust and corrupt the system and Cleon are. These ideas would challenge what audiences at the time thought of their leader and their jury system.
Plautus

Plautus borrowed a lot of his plot line and stories from New Greek comedy playwrights. Although most of his plays are Greek stories, he has incorporated Roman concepts and terms. The New Greek comedy was different from that of Aristophanes- it was more about home life and not about politics and Society as Aristophanes was. Roman people would not have cared to see a play such as The Wasps because it held many issues which did not concern them. Plautus wrote in a lively way, most of his humour being slapstick, but also having puns, irony, visual humour, and funny plot lines. However, he seems to have used slapstick comedy the most. This is because this type of humour was what the audience liked. An example of this in in the play The Swaggering Soldier when the audience is told to watch the movements of Palaestrio very carefully, as the actor is dramatically thinking. Another slightly bawdy example is in the play Casina, a Chalinus (male servant) is disguised as the woman Casina so that Casina will not have to have sex with two older men. The following "I put my hands on a... a... handle. But now that I think about it, she didn't have a sword: that would have been cold... It's so embarrassing!!" This would have been very funny and with humour humiliated the old men that the audience disliked.
However, unlike in the time of Aristophanes, the audience also needed to see violence to capture their attention. This is because violence and bloodshed were the norm of entertainment in Roman society- because of the amphitheatre. To capture audiences and make it popular, Plautus had to bring this violence onto the stage. He involved energetic mimed action and on some occasions real fights.  Violent fight scenes were common in his plays, and so were random acts of violence as a way to solve problems or for no reason, punish others. For example in the play Captiui, a slaveholder brutalizes a young man, who ironically is actually his long lost son. Another man in the same play, Hegio, says that if the slave does not do as he is told, he “shall at once have something to be giving to you.” In the play Casina, the enslaved girl Casina is bribed for sex with presents but these do not work so she is whipped and starved into submission. The violence is a strong content in Plautus’s play because of Roman society’s values at this time.

Shakespeare

Shakespeare wrote many different comedic plays, and used many different comedic devices, such as irony, language play, verbal wit, visual humour, mistaken identity, insults and bawdy humour. Shakespeare’s comedies were mostly light-hearted romantic plays with a happy ending. Shakespeare wrote comedy to entertain and amuse as well as to engage the audience so that he could show important ideas. The comedy was used to involve the audience and make them laugh. Audience laugh often because of the action, words and mistakes of characters. If his plays were not entertaining, then he would go out of business. Elizabethan people wanted to go to the theatre as a sort of escapism, because of the hard working society that they were in. Many of his comedies had fantasy settings or hard to believe story lines- which served as an escape for both the characters and the audience.
One of Shakespeare’s funniest comedies is Midsummers Night’s Dream. One example of humour is what happens between Puck and Bottom. Puck replaces Bottoms head with the head of a donkey (ass) so that the queen of the fairies who is under a spell will fall in love with him. The fact that the character is called Bottom is funny, but Shakespeare also makes Bottom turn into an Ass. Another humorous scene is when Tom Snout becomes a wall for the play and must spread his fingers to symbolize a hole in the wall through which Pyramus and Thisbe must kiss. Pyramus remarks “O kiss me through the hole of this vile wall!” and Thisbe replies “I kiss the wall’s hole, not your lips at all.” This is a mix of bawdy and visual humour.
Mistaken identity and cross dressing is a plot line that Shakespeare often used for comedy. An example is in the plays the Merry Wives of Windsor and Twelfth Night. In the Merry Wives of Windsor the huge beast of a man Falstaff dresses up as the Witch of Brenford and it’s very funny because he is a huge man with a beard and the other characters are laughing at him. In Twelfth Night, the girl Viola dresses up a boy and this causes a lot of confusion and as she is mistaken for her twin Sebastian. That creates a lot of chaos within the play because there are characters that mistake Viola for Sebastian and Sebastian for Viola. The ensuing mix-up is amusing and the audience feels a little superior because we know the real identities of the twins. This is a technique called dramatic irony.
Insults are also something that Shakespeare uses to unite the audience and they often have a slapstick affect. One example is in the play Twelfth Night. When Sir Andrew and Sir Toby Belch are talking about Andrew’s hair which is visually flat and lifeless. Andrew says “but it becomes me well enough, does’t not?” Toby says “Excellent; it hangs like a flax on a distaff; and I hope to see a housewife take thee between her legs and spin it off.” Here, Toby is not only comparing his hair to a woman spinning thread from flax. He is also insulting Toby by saying that he hopes that a woman will take him between her legs and that he contracts Syphilis, an STD which causes hair loss, hence the “spin it off.”
Summary
Many comedic devices have survived since Aristophanes and have continued to make audiences laugh. All playwrights used bawdy humour, visual humour and language wit.
Bawdy humour is evident in all of the playwrights’ work. It would seem that humans over the course of history have found humour in sexually suggestive jokes, no matter the society at the time, and humour found in women’s and men’s sexuality looks to have always appealed to audiences. It did change a little over time, with Roman bawdiness often involving more violent and oppressive situations toward women. This is because of how the society treated women and prostitutes at the time.
Visual humour has also lasted throughout all three playwrights’ work. Theatre is a very visual medium and it seems very natural for the writer to make the actors do funny and comedic things to make the audience laugh. Therefore, Aristophanes used it to appeal to his audience so that they would also take in his messages. Plautus used it so that the audience would find humour in the characters and be entertained. Likewise, Shakespeare used it to amuse his audience and make them remember the play and its themes.
Also all playwrights have used witty language. All audiences seem to have enjoyed this. It is a very entertaining form of humour and makes the audience feel good as they feel they are clever enough to get the joke. It connects the audience to the play and encourages them to listen closely to hear the puns. In listening closely, they listen also to the messages of the plays.
Mistaken identity was something introduced by Plautus and the comedy and confusion created by this was so successful and funny that it became a large part of Shakespeare’s comedies.
Conclusion
As discussed, the comedies of Aristophanes had long lasting impact on the works of Plautus and Shakespeare. Some things have hardly changed, while others have adapted to the society and audience expectations of the time. The theatre, costuming and comedic devices are just three aspects of Aristophanes’s plays which have had significant impacts on the playwrights and theatre which have followed him. It is due to the success and genius of Aristophanes’s works that he has had such a lasting influence. 


Bibliography
“William Shakespeare.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2016. Web.
“Plautus.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2016. Web.
Holloway, P. University Bursary and Scholarship Classical Studies, 1999, ESA Publications (NZ) Ltd
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theatre_of_Dionysus
Славен Косановић, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11986938
http://www.angelfire.com/hi5/interactive_learning/yr7greecefiles/yr_7_g1.gif
http://www2.springfield.k12.il.us/schools/springfield/eliz/costumes.html
 http://www.shakespearesglobe.com/about-us/history-of-the-globe/original-globe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globe_Theatre
"Plautus." Encyclopedia of World Biography. 2004. Encyclopedia.com. (June 16, 2016).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plautus#Greek_Old_Comedy
Nilsen, D and Nilsen, A.P, Shakespeare’s Humor, Irony, and Language Play Power Point Presentation
Findlay, M. 2005. Roman Social Life. In NCEA Level 2 Classical Studies. 2nd Edition, p299-343. ESA Publications (NZ) Ltd.
 Aristophanes, this translation 1964, revised 2007. Frogs and Other Plays. Penguin Books.
 http://www.messagetoeagle.com/ancient-greek-costumes-masks-and-theater/
 http://www.nthuleen.com/papers/C14paper2.html
 Bryson, B. 2007. Shakespeare. HarperCollins Publishers
 Mulherin, J. and Frost, A. 2004. The Best Loved Plays of Shakespeare. Cherrytree Books.
 Blackledge, A. 2002. DK Eyewitness Shakespeare. Dorling Kindersley Ltd.
 

Saturday, 11 April 2015

Setting in V for Vendetta


The setting is the place where the scene takes place, and what this means to the message of the movie, or the characters of the movie. Scenes in the film V for Vendetta in which setting was very important, where the scenes where Evey was in prison. The director effectively used setting in these scenes to give a felling to the audience, help show Evey’s changes and also help to show some of the movies themes.



 

In the scenes from 1:07:49 in the film, Evey is being held in prison. The prison is in an unknown location, there is no evidence as to where it is. It is dark, with no natural lighting, which in itself sends a very cold and unpleasant feeling through the audience.  The walls, floor and ceiling are all grey concrete, which creates a cold, and very unwelcoming environment. Evey’s cell is isolating and scary, to Evey and the audience. When Evey first arrives in to her cell, there are some eye of god shots which show Evey feels like she is unimportant and feels small inside. The setting of the cell and prison make her feel scared and frightened and also make her feel terror for what will happen soon.  She is surrounded in a scary and sad setting, and all she has is fear.  The setting of the cell helped the director show how the main character of Evey is feeling, and what she is thinking, and this gives the audience deeper in insight into her character. The dark and cold, altogether give an unpleasant feeling to the scene, but this changes when Evey find the letter.





Evey finds a letter from another prisoner, Valerie. It details of Valeries life, and the director changes the setting of the scene entirely by showing snapshots of Valerie life. It cuts from the terror of the cell, to a warm, lighten home. It shows Valerie in the sunshine on a farm, and Valerie happy with her girlfriend in a flat. The lighting changes dramatically as it cuts from Evey in darkness, to Valerie in the warm beautiful life she once had. However, Valeries is captured and the setting in her story becomes bleaker. The contrast in the two settings is very important because it showing Eveys changes. It is showing how the world once was, happy, beautiful and loving, to what it now is, unfair, scary and oppressive. It is showing that for the first time, Evey is realizing what is really happening and what has happened in her country, and that change really does need to happen, so that no more innocent people like Valerie are hurt. The setting shows how the experience in enlightening Evey, and creating what she wants, and what she wants to fight for. The contrast of the setting shows how much the society has actually changed, and what a terrible place it is now. The most important thing the two settings do is create more reason and means for rebellion, and the audience really understands what has happened. To Evey, the scenes show she is realizing what she should fight for, which is peace and happiness, rather than continuing to live under fear and terror. These two settings are crucial in creating who Evey is, and help her make decisions in what follows.

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Mise en Scene in V for Vendetta


Mise en scene is a narrative feature, of all the things on the screen, used to install a feeling into the audience, or used to help convey a theme of the text. Parts of Mise-en-scene particularly prevalent in the film V for Vendetta were lighting, costume, performance and setting. Although these techniques were used throughout V for Vendetta, they were used particularly well in the scene were Evey is first interrogated in the prison, at around 1:06:50 in the film.

Lighting

 
The lighting is extremely effective in the scene where Evey is first being interrogated by the mystery man. Just before the scene, Evey is ‘black bagged’ and the screen goes pitch black, just like what Evey would be seeing under the bag. This is quite scary to the audience, as we hear Evey screaming and see nothing. This lighting here is showing fear, and the audience really get a sense of the terror Evey is feeling.  The darkness draws the audience in, and suddenly the bag is taken off, with a high contrast of Eveys white face to the darkness the screen had been before. Eveys face is lighten up by a spotlight that only illuminates her. The light is bright white and very harsh, showing how Evey feels in this scene. This is very interesting to the audience’s eye, as Evey looks as if she is caught in a shaft of light, and everything else around her is darkness, she also becomes the audience’s centre of attention.  This spotlight lighting shows the focus is all on Evey in this scene, and that she is very important (a spotlight alike to this one is also used to illuminate the main star of a play while on stage) It shows the importance Evey to her capturers and her decision, and how her decision to divulge information or not will change the path of the movie. It also shows the importance of this moment to Eveys character, and how it has a big part to play in who she becomes and what she is fighting for. The bigger meaning of the spotlight is to do with Eveys character and how important the moment is in the storyline, but is also to do with one of the main themes of the movie, ruling people with fear. The interrogation room is not only cold and concrete, but its spotlight lighting on Evey is very ominous and threatening. It shows how the government gets what they want through installing terror and fear into their people. This theme is also shown through another aspect of lighting in this scene, the lighting on the interrogator. The interrogator has no light on him, and he is completely in black, just a silhouette.  We cannot recognise him, so we do not know him, but he holds the power to kill Evey, and this makes him very threatening and scarier. The audience reacts in the same way as Evey to the capturer, with terror and fright. The lighting on the man also helps show the main theme of ruling with fear, and how much society has changed.  Today someone in suspicion would sit down with a police officer like normal, however, Evey is towered over by a dark and mysterious power figure, showing how much more this government rules with fear.  


  Costume

In this scene costume is also used to communicate with the audience.  Evey is dressed in a white singlet which creates a high visual contrast with her surroundings. This also brings our eye to Evey, and she stands out. As white is often associated with purity and innocence, it is suggesting Evey is truly innocent and full of virtue. As it also makes her stand out, the white singlet is also used to tell the watcher that Evey is the main focus in the scene, and the scene and what is happening is very important in her life.

The costume of the interrogator is non existent, he is a completely black silhouette, and there is no clothes or identity given to him. This creates a real sense of mystery around him, and makes him look scary and shady. Because there is no way to identify him, we, and Evey are more scared and frightened about who he is and what he has the power to do. We find out later, that the black silhouette is actually V. The director has had no costume on the capturer to create a higher sense of fear and power in the scene. The director used the white top to help further show how important the scene is to Evey, but also how she is truly pure at heart.  
 
Performance

 

Natalie Portman did an amazing performance in portraying Evey in this scene. She is shaking and her eyes are wide, her mouth open in a shocked expression. All of these aspects on Portman’s performance accurately show just how frightened and scared Evey is. The shaking especially shows she is in shock, and fears what will happen, and the wide eyes make her look like she is a deer caught in the headlights, they are full of dread and terror. It is obvious from Portman’s performance and body language how Evey is feeling. Portman’s performance was very important in this scene to heighten our sense of fear for Evey, and also shows what a big moment in Evey’s life this is. It also is important later on, when Evey is in the same situation again, and is cool, calm and collected. It shows accurately that indeed Eveys has no fear anymore, and in this scene she is visually full of terror, and later on, she has learnt to deal with fear.

The performance of the capturer is important as well. He acts in a very unfriendly and matter of fact way. His voice is quiet monotone, and he is very harsh. This shows the audience that he is the enemy in the scene, and he is holding the power to harm and kill Evey. His performance shock us and Evey, and also help to show one of the movies main themes, power over people. His performance shows how throwing threats around is scaring and manipulating the people. This shows that the government thinks that they can get and do whatever they want, by using fear and death as threats. It shows that ruling with fear is explosive and very bad for the people and society.  His performance gives in sight to the watcher of how bad things in this futuristic society really are, and we understand why it needs to change.


Props/Setting


The setting in this scene is definitely used to create a feeling and show a theme.  The scene is in an interrogation room. It is made out of concrete, is very dark and has no natural light. There is only a table, a chair and some table lights. The use of an interrogation room makes the focus on Evey, as she is under interrogation and is being treated like a criminal. Buy there being not much furniture, again makes the audience focus on Evey as she is the main thing in the scene. It also shows that Evey feels very uncomfortable in this alien environment. There is no natural light and this is really creepy. It personally made me feel more negative feelings towards the room and the situation, because without windows, it seems very trapping and uncomfortable. Having no windows also shows how Evey feels, isolated and alone. Having only bright white, artificial lighting also shows how the environment is very harsh and unforgiving, and made me personally feel creeped out. The concrete walls and floor makes the whole scene and situation feel very cold, gloomy, and scary. The director used this cold and harsh setting to show how scared and uncomfortable Evey is, and make the audience feel the doom and terror Evey may be feeling.


Wednesday, 1 April 2015

Symbols and Motifs in V for Vendetta

In the film 'V for Vendetta' directed by James McTeigue, the use of the narrative feature of  symbols and motifs accurately help to show the main themes of the movie. A symbol is a object which represents an idea. In V for Vendetta, the symbolism of the V, the party's emblem, the shot of Chancellor Sutler, and the mask all help to show the main ideas of the film.


 

One of the main things that the audience sees as a symbol is the V within a circle, often seen in red. This symbol is everywhere and  reoccurs many times in the film, which really hammers into the audience the importance of this symbol. It is one of the first things we see of modern times, and
reappear throughout the film. It is the symbol of the character V, and his movement and rebellion against he governments ways. It begins to appear more as the movie progresses, like being spray painted on walls and being made out of dominos. This shows how the symbol of the rebellion is growing stronger, and how, although it is just a symbol it now holds power in the people, and people believe in what it stands for. it becomes a symbol for the uprising, and for people rebelling against the controlling government and breaking free from the fear installed in them. The symbolism of the V helps to show one of V for Vendettas main themes, rebellion. It shows how when a symbol's idea  is believed in by people it gains power and becomes a force. I believe that this still happens today in the real world, with people willing to fight for their flag, or fight or do something for a cause or idea. The actual design of the logo shows V surrounded by a circle. This shows how the actual character of V began the revolution, and know the idea of it has spread around the people. It is also coloured red which is the colour of extremes. It's the colour of passion, seduction, violence, danger, anger, and adventure. This further shows what V is fighting for, the right to be able to be free and to do what you want to.  However, it also symbolizes the anger and thirst for revenge that V has, and shows that maybe his intentions arent as pure as the audience thinks.





There is also the symbolism of the baptism of the two main characters. We see the scene of Evey, standing, being washed in the rain, and cut into this is the scene of V in the fire. These scenes symbolize a rebirth, and show the importance of this moment to the characters spirit and being.
In the scene of V, he is surrounded by fire, showing he is burnt and scarred.  He was made and created by fire, which symbolizes he has anger from his rebirth. This is the moment that creates V, as a vengeful and violent human. This further shows that V is not entirely the perfect freedom fighter, he is full of angry fire, and is out to get revenge.
However, Eveys baptism is in the rain. She is being washed, perhaps symbolizing the washing away of her sins, and cleansing her being. This symbolizes she is pure and true, and is in the revolution for the right reasons. She welcomes the rain and her rebirth, where as V is angry. The symbolism of the Eveys baptism shows she is a good person, and that she isn't filled with anger as V is, but she is full of virtue and morality, and is part of the revolution for the right reasons. This is further enhanced by a real baptism, showing she is saintly and angelic, and has good values.
The symbolism of the baptisms help the audience understand the characters of V and Evey more, as to why they want to start the revolution. The audience sees their rebirth and the changing of these characters lives as they are reborn. The baptisms in both cases created theses two characters, and changed their future.

 
The Guy Fawkes mask is also a big symbol in V for Vendetta. The mask is what we see of the main character, V. Other people also start to wear the mask, and at the end, all of the protestors wear it. V wears it to hide who he is because he was burnt so badly in the fire. However, it becomes a symbol for the rebellion and fighting for freedom form the government. It is a mask of Guy Fawkes, and this makes it seem to the audience like V holds the same motives and Guy Fawkes does. One of the biggest things the mask represents is hiding who V is. This makes it so V could be anyone, showing that the freedom he is fighting for would mean something to everyone. This is further shown when Evey says "he was all of us."  As the audience and V himself do not know his past, the mask, the ideas he is fighting for becomes him when he has the mask on. His identity is the mask, and what the mask symbolises. By wearing the mask,  V becomes something larger than human. He becomes the living embodiment of an ideal. This is something that more people can follow and believe in. When other people start to wear the mask, it becomes even more of a symbol of rebellion, and when everyone wears it to the parliament, it shows that although everyone is different there is the same need for freedom and want for justice that V has, within everyone. The symbolism of the mask really helped show the films main ideas of rebellion, and how ideas are stronger than a man, and can be within everyone.
 
 
Mostly every time we see Chancellor Sutler, the shots of him are zoomed up close and projected onto the wall, making him giant in comparison with the other people in the scene. By the director doing this, it is symbolising the great power and strength of Sutler, and how he is in charge, and that he is all powerful. It shows he is the leader, and a kind of big brother. It also effectively shows how Sutler is villainous, because he is the only one so big, he is the dictator, and he rules with fear.  This depiction of Sutler as a large and all powerful character shows the themes of totalitarian and the terrible affect that ruling with fear has on a country.  



Sunday, 15 March 2015

Sound in The Piano


The Narrative feature of Sound is a big part of the film The Piano. Both silence and music are used to create meaning.

Silence

The film The Piano has a lot of silence in it. One big reason for this is that the main character, Ada, does not speak. The scenes with her in them are filled with mystery and the audience is intrigued as to what she is thinking, and what she will do next. Scenes such as the one at 74:23, when Ada visits Baines, are slightly uncomfortable and eerie. The fact she doesn’t speak creates a lot of tension between the characters and makes the audience feel this tension. Adas silence symbolizes her anguish at being oppressed and her feeling like she cannot  express herself in her society. The silence utilised in The Piano is very different from other films, and I believe it breaks the convention of many romance movies. The audience cannot focus or sing along to the classic rom-com music, so the audience notice more about the characters, mise en scene, and visual elements. Ada is silent, and this is creates a very peculiar dynamic in scenes. The silence is long and drawn out, and so are the words that are spoken. The silence makes the audience really listen and try to interpret the things the characters say. I believe the silence really helps contribute to the dark and grim undertones of the movie, and enforces Adas feeling of opression and feeling like she cant express herself in her society.   

Music

Music plays a big part in The Piano. The music score is mostly piano music, and one song in particular is repeated throughout the film. The music actually represents Ada’s voice, her thoughts and her feelings. We can listen to the music and know what she feels. Ada herself says “I do not make myself quiet. That is because of my Piano.” The same song is repeated throughout the film. This helps show the continuity of Ada's character throughout the movie, mirroring the way she is always stubborn and refuses to stay in her gender role. However, the song is played differently in different parts of the film. There are different intensitys, tempos, volumes, that help to create a different meaning, moods and atmospheres in different scenes.
For instance, in the climax scene, it is played getting louder, and keeps doubling in speed. This is a big part of the building intensity and creating the effective climax the scene is. The change in the tune shows the audience Adas changing feelings and thoughts. The past pace and loud playing of the music in the finger cutting scene shows the audience Ada feels threatened and scared. As the fight moves outside, the tempo doubles again, mirroring the fright and desperation Ada is feeling in this scene.
Another scene is when Ada must leave the Piano on the beach. The song is played slowly and with sadness, showing Ada doesn’t feel comfortable with leaving the piano. It is played softly and thoughfully, showing that Ada is thinking about the importance of the piano and expression to her. 
When Ada visits the Piano on the beach, she plays the song quickly and spritely. This shows she feels happy that she can again express her feelings.
 Another example of the music accurately mirroring what Ada is feeling Is when Ada plays in her sleep. The music is loud and she plays angrily, stabbing at the keys. This shows her anger at her husband for keeping her locked up. The careless and angry sound of the song, and loud tempo of the song at this point in the movie gives Ada a chance to express herself. The audience sees her exasperation at being confined to her gender role, and being opreesed by her husband, two main themes from the film.  
When Ada is in Nelson at the end of the movie, the music is steady and played in major. This gives the audience the impression that Ada is fulfilled and finally happy. The sad undertones are gone and the conflict has been resolved. Using the piano music as another outlet to create characters emotion helps the audience see yet another aspect to how they are feeling. The tone of the actual music gives a feeling to the audience.  I have never seen a movie where the music has such an impression on the audience, and has passed a mood through me.   

Saturday, 14 March 2015

Mise-en-scène in the Piano


 ‘Mise-en-scène’ are all the things on the screen that create a message and a vibe. It is the arrangement of everything on the screen that help the director communicate their ideas. Aspects of Mise-en-scène include lighting, costume and setting. In the film The Piano, director Jane Campion uses the narrative feature of Mise-en-scène very effectively to create powerful meaning and feelings. One of the most prevalent scenes Campion used this in, is the scene where Alistair cuts off Ada’s finger. 

Lighting


Lighting was used extremely effectively in the scene where Ada’s finger gets chopped off, and throughout the whole movie. When Alistair confronts Ada in the house, (97:13), the lighting is warm and homely. This makes the audience feel conflicted and confused. The warm lighting looks normal, and this makes the the audience really focus in on the fight that is unfolding. The normal lighing is contrasted with the abnormal scene. However, as the couple move the fight to outside, (97:37) the lighting changes dramatically. It suddenly becomes dark and gloomy. Everything looks bleaker and scarier. This sends a negative feeling to the audience, and the audience feels more scared and worried. The dark lighting in this scene helps to raise the intensity, and also is used to surround the characters in gloom and despair. the dark lighting makes the audience feel more uneasy, and really reflects Adas feeling at the time. She feels scared, a colur which is often shown in dark, black colours. Lighting is also used very well in the rest of the film. One other example is the way Campion uses lighting to reflect how Ada feels. For example, in Baines house, when Ada realizes she loves him, there is light shining in the window, and Ada is illuminated. This shows the audience that she feels happy and finally has a place she can belong. Another example is when Ada plays the piano on the beach. Sunlight streams onto Ada’s face and she smiles. To the audience she looks brighter and happier. Campion shows, through the lighting that Ada feels happiness when she is playing the piano and expressing herself.

Setting


Setting is a big part of Mise-en-scène which helps evoke a feeling in the audience. The Piano was shot on location on the rugged west coast of the South Island of New Zealand. The setting is dark, cold, harsh and scary. The setting made Ada feel isolated and scared, in what should  have been her happy home. The woods are wet,muddy and filthy, and it is a very unpleasant place. The grim setting gives the audience a miserable feel, and scenes in the harsh environment feel more desperate and cruel. In the scene where Ada’s finger is cut off, at 98:31 there is torrential rain, dark lighting and mud. These combined give a horrible feel to the scene. It feels cold, sad, hopeless and desolate. The thunder storm also helps add to the intensity. There are also fallen trees spiking out of the ground. These give the feeling the setting is unforgiving and scary, and makes the setting look more brutal and violent. The harsh setting of this particular scene helps reflect the violence the Alistair is showing and also helps make  the scene the terrible climax it is. The terrrible setting of the entire movie reflects Adas emotjions, and shows how she is sad and lonely, and not happy in her home. The film is also set in a historical period  which is very important to creating the character of Ada. Because of the time and place, Ada is forced to do what she is told, and is oppressed by Alistair. She is supposed to stay at home and be the perfect wife to Alistair, but she chooses not to.      

Costume
Ada's costume is very important in the movie. It symbolises her oppression, as she is forced to wear the large uncomfortable thing by society. It represents her being held to what society tells her to do, and what she supposed to be. she feels trapped, both by the cage-like dress, and by societies rules that she is supposed to follow.  However, Ada also uses the dress as protection, both on the beach and from Alasdair advances.  Ada always wears dark colours, blacks and browns. This makes her look sad and unhappy all of the time, as she is surrounded in a colour that evokes sadness in the audience. However, we see this change at the end of the movie. Adas new dress is not as big, and a blue floral pattern. This shows she is opening up, and becoming happier. She no longer feels uncomfortable, and can now express herself, and love who ahe wishes. 
Another character who's costume was important was Flora. She is not yet condemned to wear the burdens of being a women in that time period, so her costume changes throughout the movie. In the scene where Ada's finger is cut off, her costume is very important. She is dressed in white with angel wings, showing she is innocent and pure, and tried to do the right thing, however, as soon as she make the decision to take the note to Alistair and not Baines, she becomes dirty and guilty. The storm and mud makes her covered in dirt, and then her mothers blood splatters on her and her clothes. This shows she has seen the consequences to her actions and that she has hurt her mother.